Literal-Minded

Linguistic commentary from a guy who takes things too literally

Boy Scout Backformation

Posted by Neal on August 30, 2010

Adam is going into his fourth year of Cub Scouts, which means he is now considered a Webelos Scout. Webelos is a name that is supposed to sound kind of like a Native American name, but one which fortunately contains only English phonemes and obeys English phonotactic rules. And, unlike most Native American words, it’s an acronym. (At least, I haven’t heard of acronym formation in Native American languages, but if someone knows better, please correct me. Maybe Ryan does.) I’ve learned that Webelos originally stood for “Wolf, Bear, Lion, Scout,” with Wolf, Bear, and Lion being the three age-graded ranks of Cub Scouts, but what is lion doing in a faux Native American acronym? Well, it’s like this (if you can believe the current Wikipedia entry): The Cub Scout program in the United States was a melding of a British model, which used Kipling’s The Jungle Book as an underpinning for names of ranks and other things, and a United States model, which went with Native American.

A logo with appeal! Get it? A p- ... oh, never mind.

However, by the time I was old enough to be a Cub Scout — I wasn’t one, but there was a time when I was old enough to be one — the Lion rank had disappeared, which undermined the basis for the acronym. So it’s not too surprising that the acronym had been regrounded by the time my classmates Peter Hannon, John Wickland, and Doug Stewart became Webelos Scouts. I learned from them that Webelos stood for “We Be Loyal Scouts.” I wondered a bit at the nonstandard grammar We be, but wasn’t curious enough to pursue it. Another question I didn’t pursue was why out of all the 12 characteristics mentioned in the Boy Scout Law, it was #2 on the list, loyalty that got put into the Webelos name. Yet another: Why the logo on their caps that looked like a half-peeled banana. (Looking at it now, I see that it’s a clever mashup of the Boy Scouts’ fleur-de-lis and a letter W.)

Sometime in the past 30 years, though, the acronymic basis for Webelos was tweaked a little to be the more standard “We’ll Be Loyal Scouts.” When I read that in Adam’s Tiger manual three years ago, I figured I must have mis-heard or misremembered what Peter, Doug, and John had been saying, or that perhaps they had mis-heard it when they learned it, but when the topic came up on the American Dialect Society email list last year, Arnold Zwicky mentioned that it had been “We Be Loyal Scouts” when he was in Cub Scouts.

As I’ve heard adult leaders in Adam’s Cub Scout pack talk about Webelos Scouts, I’ve noticed the near-universal (in this population) syncope of the unstressed medial syllable, such that it’s pronounced ['wibloʊːz] instead of ['wibəloʊːz]. Sometimes it’s even spelled “Weblos”. As I’ve thought about the acronym more, I’ve noted that whereas the initial s in Scouts is pronounced [s], the s at the end of Webelos is pronounced [z]. On the one hand, that’s not unusual: It’s a well-studied rule that in English, /s/ after a vowel is often voiced and turned into [z]. But on the other hand, this is not just a phonemic rule, i.e. one that always happens to /s/ after a vowel. If it were, we wouldn’t have words like piss, gas, mess, and pus. It’s a morpho-phonemic rule, meaning that the phonetic alternation happens only when this /s/ is a morpheme, that is, when it carries a meaning. Specifically, it only happens when the /s/ is the -s suffix for plural nouns or third-person singular present-tense verbs. So pronouncing Webelos with a [z] a the end, as the Webelos Handbook instructs, is just asking — begging! — for a backformation to occur. It’s practically forcing the listener to parse it as a plural noun, Webelo-s, and to conclude that there is such a thing as a singular noun Webelo.

And in fact, everyone associated with Adam’s Cub Scout pack does this. As they would say, “Adam is a Webelo.” They even use the backformed singular in compound nouns, as in “We have two Webelo dens,” or “Did you bring your Webelo handbook?” I’m sure I’ve done it myself, too.


I looked in the manual to see if its writers ever used the backformed Webelo, and as far as I can see, they have been very careful. On the cover it says “Webelos Handbook”, and inside it talks consistently about “Webelos Scouts”. Most tellingly, it even asks on page 4, “What is a Webelos Scout?” — singular Scout, plural-looking Webelos. A little searching through Google Books brings up this official-sounding statement from page 6 of the October 1996 issue of Scouting magazine, in an editorial response to a reader who asks if it’s correct to way “Webelo scout”:

Well, I’ve got some bad news for the BSA. People have been saying Webelo since at least 1961. For there to have been even a chance of speakers not inventing Webelo somewhere along the way, they should have been taking pains to have people pronounce it with an [s] at the end: ['wibəloʊs]. It would have sounded like a word borrowed from Greek, like ethos, pathos, cosmos, or kudos. Even that would have been no guarantee. Just look at what happened to kudos. It refers to something (praise) that can easily be perceived as a collection of things (individual compliments), and that semantic pull was enough to turn the [kʰuɾoʊs] pronunciation into [kʰuɾoʊːz], and now you can even hear people talking about “a kudo“. In fact, there’s even some confusion with cosmos. But back to what I was saying: If backformation created kudo even when singular kudos required a change in pronunciation to allow this to happen, what hope did already-plural-sounding Webelos ever have?

About these ads

15 Responses to “Boy Scout Backformation”

  1. Glen said

    When I was a cub scout, I recall pronouncing the word Webelos with [s], not [z]. However, I also recall avoiding pronouncing the word at all because (a) I was uncertain about its pronunciation and usage, and (b) I thought the word was silly anyway.

  2. H. R. Freckenhorst said

    Regarding the syncope: Your home city is regularly pronounced Clumbus in these southern Ohio parts, and the ritzy Cincinnati suburb is Indun Hill. (Though Native Americans and [I think] the Cleveland baseball team retain all three syllables. And the capitol of Indiana [4 syllables] is Indunanpolis.) If that syncopation common as far north as Columbus it could be a regionalism.

    At the same time, that suggests that the word is perceived as a word and not as the pronunciation of an acronym, which would (I’d think) tend to preserve the enunciation of each syllable.

    • Neal said

      Ah, yes, Clumbus! I meant to mention that one. And on the acronym/backformation side, I wanted to put in Portable On Demand Storage units, PODS for short, which have inevitably been shortened to POD to refer to just one of the containers.

  3. Jonathan Lighter said

    In my Cub Scout days (NYC, 1959-61), it was always pronounced /’wEbloz/.

    I’m pretty sure that an individual was informally a “Webelo” even then. (Seems inevitable.) I’m more sure that “Webelo” didn’t appear in any of the manuals.

    Perhaps needless to say, the interpretation “We(‘ll) Be Loyal Scouts” was nonexistent. The Wolf-Bear-Lion-Scout origin was official, and even Bobcats (rookies) had to know it.

  4. The Ridger said

    Hmmm. Why isn’t it Wobelis, then?

    And even if Kipling is involved, I recall not one single lion. Tigers (boo) and leopards (panthers), yes… Wolves, Bears, Panthers it should be. Wobepas. That’s got a ring to it.

  5. kip said

    I was only a Cub Scout for maybe six months. Somehow I interpreted that the “s” in “Webelos” was silent, like in “Illinois.”

  6. Hannah Moore said

    I do believe that the North American continent is home to a species known as “Mountain Lion”, Cougar, Panther or Puma (Puma Concolor). Maybe that’s how the Yanks made the Kipling origin work state-side. Thanks, Neal, for this fascinating blog!

    • Neal said

      True enough. But, as you know, some time after the Lion rank was retired, and the age limit was lowered, the rank of Tiger was added. (Tiger Cub, if you insist, but they don’t call the Wolfs Wolf Cubs, or the Bears Bear Cubs.) And I’ve visited the Columbus Zoo’s Asia Quest exhibit to know that there are no tigers in North America!

  7. Putakratu said

    I thought it was referring to the status of the Webelo – he is now just a “wee [bit] below” the scouts. Silly me.

  8. [...] enough about that. The highlight of the evening was the “crossing over” of the older Webelos Scouts to officially become Boy Scouts. Adam himself is now a Webelos Scout, and will do his [...]

  9. [...] Looking at it that way, I see that gro[ʃ]ry is no more unusual than C’lumbus, Ohio, or Web’los. But if you keep the unstressed syllable, then both gro[ʃ]ry and C’lumbus may strike you as [...]

  10. [...] couple of years ago, in a post about the backformation of the Boy Scouting-related singular noun Webelo from Webelos, I mentioned [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 470 other followers

%d bloggers like this: